| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jing Wang <jingwangian(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority |
| Date: | 2019-01-18 01:01:44 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHJN_1okcTKS12Sa90xQ7ApfHv5LmNS-kSoW+5ucV_Zg-A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 19:56, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> >> > I'm curious; under what circumstances would the above occur?
> >>
> >> Former primary goes down and one of standbys is promoting but it is
> >> not promoted to new primary yet.
> >>
> >
> > seems like JDBC might have some work to do...Thanks
> >
> > I'm going to wait to implement until we resolve this discussion
>
> If you need some input from me regarding finding a primary node,
> please say so. While working on Pgpool-II project, I learned the
> necessity in a hard way.
>
>
I would really like to have a consistent way of doing this, and consistent
terms for the connection parameters.
that said yes, I would like input from you.
Thanks,
Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-01-18 01:08:07 | Re: pgsql: Restrict the use of temporary namespace in two-phase transaction |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-01-18 00:59:49 | Re: pgsql: Restrict the use of temporary namespace in two-phase transaction |