Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com
Cc: ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at, kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com, jingwangian(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Date: 2019-01-18 00:56:45
Message-ID: 20190118.095645.940623653127358231.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> > I'm curious; under what circumstances would the above occur?
>>
>> Former primary goes down and one of standbys is promoting but it is
>> not promoted to new primary yet.
>>
>
> seems like JDBC might have some work to do...Thanks
>
> I'm going to wait to implement until we resolve this discussion

If you need some input from me regarding finding a primary node,
please say so. While working on Pgpool-II project, I learned the
necessity in a hard way.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-01-18 00:59:49 Re: pgsql: Restrict the use of temporary namespace in two-phase transaction
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-01-18 00:43:38 Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD