Re: More protocol.h replacements this time into walsender.c

From: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More protocol.h replacements this time into walsender.c
Date: 2025-07-25 10:28:28
Message-ID: CADK3HH+B_V5+tn6SA7atkJ0V1JQwKBTgRtOCKA1o90O+2VUz=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 at 06:23, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:

> On 2025-Jul-25, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> > FYI, the reason I used XLogData is because the term is used multiple
> times
> > here https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/protocol-replication.html
>
> Yeah, we could rename it, as in the attached. It doesn't harm anything.
>

Consistency is good. If your patch were applied, then it would be
consistent to use WALData

Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-07-25 10:41:09 Re: Enhance pg_createsubscriber to create required standby.
Previous Message Jakub Wartak 2025-07-25 10:27:11 Re: Adding basic NUMA awareness