Re: More protocol.h replacements this time into walsender.c

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More protocol.h replacements this time into walsender.c
Date: 2025-07-25 14:34:31
Message-ID: aIOV9xMUtSePwKOD@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 06:28:28AM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 at 06:23, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
>> Yeah, we could rename it, as in the attached. It doesn't harm anything.
>
> Consistency is good. If your patch were applied, then it would be
> consistent to use WALData

+1

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-07-25 14:38:31 Re: More protocol.h replacements this time into walsender.c
Previous Message Zhang Mingli 2025-07-25 14:04:38 Re: Retail DDL