Re: Sigh, I broke crake again

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:08 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I wrote:
> > I had not intended to back-patch, since those changes were just cosmetic,
> > but it might be the best way to preserve the XversionUpgrade tests.
>
> After closer study, it seems like the least painful answer is:
>
> 1. In HEAD, revert the renaming of int44in/int44out to
> city_budget_in/_out; the gain in obviousness isn't worth the screwing
> around we'd have to do to cope with it in cross-version upgrade testing.
>
> 2. In the back branches, drop the CREATE FUNCTION commands for
> funny_dup17 and boxarea, which are used nowhere so they can easily
> be dispensed with.
>
> We could ask TestUpgradeXversion.pm to drop the latter two functions,
> similarly to what it's already doing for oldstyle_length. But
> oldstyle_length was actually being used for something in the older
> branches so it was worth the trouble to cope with a cross-branch
> difference. These two don't seem worth changing the buildfarm for.
>
>

I see you're reverted the change that caused the issue. The fact is that
we're always going to get this sort of issue from time to time with
cross-version testing. FWIW, my experience in testing the module offline
over an extended period (several years) is that the breakage isn't very
frequent. I'm always willing to make small tweaks to accommodate things
like name changes. It's not terribly difficult. I think it's sufficiently
important that we have good cross-version upgrade testing that we can
tolerate a little temporary breakage occasionally.

cheers

andrew