Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies
Date: 2021-04-13 06:05:11
Message-ID: CAD21AoDWRh6oTN5T8wa+cpZUVpHXET8BJ8Da7WHVHpwkPP6KLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 11:42 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:41 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 8:52 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> > > All of the changes from your fixup patch are clear improvements, and
> > > so I'll include them in the final commit. Thanks!

I realized that when the failsafe is triggered, we don't bypass heap
truncation that is performed before updating relfrozenxid. I think
it's better to bypass it too. What do you think?

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Zagorskikh 2021-04-13 06:35:51 Re: Contribution to PostgreSQL - please give an advice
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2021-04-13 05:51:48 Retry in pgbench