Re: CLUSTER command progress monitor

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tatsuro Yamada <yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER command progress monitor
Date: 2017-09-04 02:51:28
Message-ID: CAD21AoDTqz5GzGeJOQHS7vL+Bk1a-Eps+hxNOFppbYh8UrSSYg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Tatsuro Yamada
<yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hi Sawada-san, Thomas,
>
> Thanks for sharing the reggression.diff.
> I realized Thomas's comment is right.
>
> Attached patch is fixed version.
> Could you try it?
>

Yeah, in my environment the regression test passed. Thanks.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2017-09-04 03:38:55 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-09-04 02:38:01 Re: Secondary index access optimizations