Re: CLUSTER command progress monitor

From: Tatsuro Yamada <yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER command progress monitor
Date: 2017-09-04 05:53:30
Message-ID: 59ACEA5A.4090901@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Sawada-san,

Thanks for taking your time.
I'll be more careful.

Regards,
Tatsuro Yamada

On 2017/09/04 11:51, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Tatsuro Yamada
> <yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Hi Sawada-san, Thomas,
>>
>> Thanks for sharing the reggression.diff.
>> I realized Thomas's comment is right.
>>
>> Attached patch is fixed version.
>> Could you try it?
>>
>
> Yeah, in my environment the regression test passed. Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Masahiko Sawada
> NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
> NTT Open Source Software Center
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-09-04 06:14:00 Re: [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held when calling PageGetLSN()
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2017-09-04 05:50:46 Re: Parallel worker error