Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2023-09-17 03:21:47
Message-ID: CAD21AoDNZBVK9j=ybecRZ89aO__qeFMtg-cXfbPHd_h5gG=7YA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 9:03 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-08-28 23:43:22 +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > I've attached v42 patch set. I improved tidstore regression test codes
> > in addition of imcorporating the above comments.
>
> Why did you need to disable the benchmark module for CI?

I didn't want to unnecessarily make cfbot unhappy since the benchmark
module is not going to get committed to the core and sometimes not
up-to-date.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Rijkers 2023-09-17 06:37:11 Re: remaining sql/json patches
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2023-09-16 23:41:12 Re: JSON Path and GIN Questions