Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2023-09-16 00:03:12
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2023-08-28 23:43:22 +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I've attached v42 patch set. I improved tidstore regression test codes
> in addition of imcorporating the above comments.

Why did you need to disable the benchmark module for CI?


Andres Freund

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-09-16 00:13:18 Re: Add 'worker_type' to pg_stat_subscription
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-09-16 00:00:11 Re: Performance degradation on concurrent COPY into a single relation in PG16.