Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Duncan Sands <duncan(dot)sands(at)deepbluecap(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5
Date: 2025-06-23 07:14:45
Message-ID: CAD21AoD736ECsU-FR5x+hp87vuZzOc1N3sknvSwKuW=XEz0Jgw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:52 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 8:28 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 at 13:51, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
> > <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > To fix the test failure, I suggest to just remove the case. Insert-after-commit
> > > case has already been tested by above part of this file, so no need to do others.
> >
> > Alternatively I was thinking of a fix if it is possible to run this
> > test conditionally when CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS is not defined, I was not
> > sure if it is easy to do that and worth the effort for the PG13
> > branch. I'm ok with the proposed change.
> >
>
> I prefer to change the test because, if the above analysis is correct,
> it indicates that the test has a cache flush hazard. It would be
> better to make the test robust instead of working around it.

The analysis shared by Kuroda-san matches my understanding. I'd like
to avoid removing this test case just because it doesn't pass with
CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS.

One solution is to have two expected-output files to cover both cases.
We do a similar thing for the plpgsql_cache.sql test case. What do you
think?

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2025-06-23 09:13:49 Re: BUG #18953: Planner fails to build plan for complex query with LATERAL references
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-06-23 02:52:45 Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5