From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Duncan Sands <duncan(dot)sands(at)deepbluecap(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 |
Date: | 2025-06-23 02:52:45 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JjGrMsLoMdCynBLkPW5oTPsgpZKyJTP1g6YV+mmV-zWw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 8:28 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 at 13:51, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
> <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> > To fix the test failure, I suggest to just remove the case. Insert-after-commit
> > case has already been tested by above part of this file, so no need to do others.
>
> Alternatively I was thinking of a fix if it is possible to run this
> test conditionally when CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS is not defined, I was not
> sure if it is easy to do that and worth the effort for the PG13
> branch. I'm ok with the proposed change.
>
I prefer to change the test because, if the above analysis is correct,
it indicates that the test has a cache flush hazard. It would be
better to make the test robust instead of working around it.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-06-23 07:14:45 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-06-22 18:31:56 | Re: BUG #18953: Planner fails to build plan for complex query with LATERAL references |