Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Oh, Mike" <minsoo(at)amazon(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
Date: 2022-08-03 04:06:25
Message-ID: CAD21AoD4Odx+dQi-K1tvVTEjkvWYk=UafKNZNVyQvsnGWPX7WA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 5:31 PM shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 10:31 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 7:46 AM Masahiko Sawada
> > <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:45 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > I've attached updated patches for all branches. Please review them.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks, the patches look mostly good to me. I have made minor edits by
> > removing 'likely' from a few places as those don't seem to be adding
> > much value, changed comments at a few places, and was getting
> > compilation in error in v11/10 (snapbuild.c:2111:3: error: ‘for’ loop
> > initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode) which I have fixed.
> > See attached, unless there are major comments/suggestions, I am
> > planning to push this day after tomorrow (by Wednesday) after another
> > pass.
> >
>
> Thanks for updating the patch.
>
> Here are some minor comments:
>
> 1.
> patches for REL10 ~ REL13:
> + * Mark the transaction as containing catalog changes. In addition, if the
> + * given xid is in the list of the initial running xacts, we mark the
> + * its subtransactions as well. See comments for NInitialRunningXacts and
> + * InitialRunningXacts for additional info.
>
> "mark the its subtransactions"
> ->
> "mark its subtransactions"
>
> 2.
> patches for REL10 ~ REL15:
> In the comment in catalog_change_snapshot.spec, maybe we can use "RUNNING_XACTS"
> instead of "RUNNING_XACT" "XACT_RUNNING", same as the patch for master branch.
>

Thank you for the comments! These have been incorporated in the latest
version v12 patch I just submitted.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-08-03 04:51:15 Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-08-03 04:05:30 Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns