Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:11 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 4/10/18 6:14 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> On 16 January 2018 at 06:21, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:40:43AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9 January 2018 at 04:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>> We're not talking about standbys, so the message is incorrect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah, I understood. How about "\"%s\" has now caught up with upstream
>>>>>> server"?
>>>>>
>>>>> +1.
>>>>
>>>> upstream is what I would have suggested, so +1 here also.
>>>>
>>>> Will commit.
>>>
>>> ping?
>>>
>>
>> Should I add this item to "Older Bugs" of the open item since we
>> regarded it as a bug?
>
> I'm going to reclassify this as a bug since everyone seems to agree it
> is one.

I've added this to Open Items so as not to forget.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center