Re: VACUUM (PARALLEL) option processing not using DefElem the way it was intended

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VACUUM (PARALLEL) option processing not using DefElem the way it was intended
Date: 2025-10-09 17:34:28
Message-ID: CAD21AoCFRN6X0a8Yu7TzFaTq_H10HRj5p3KS6ZL_m2n3qf0-hQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 5:02 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Oct-09, David Rowley wrote:
>
> > Ok, I've adjusted that in the attached.
>
> LGTM, thanks.

LGTM too. Thank you!

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John H 2025-10-09 17:56:48 Re: Making pg_rewind faster
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-10-09 17:33:44 Re: Adding some error context for lock wait failures