Re: VACUUM (PARALLEL) option processing not using DefElem the way it was intended

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VACUUM (PARALLEL) option processing not using DefElem the way it was intended
Date: 2025-10-09 20:26:52
Message-ID: CAApHDvoxK8peDC1yZSekb8FdUqrKd6VnfTYm8-TP0xim9k9+dw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 at 06:35, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 5:02 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
> > LGTM, thanks.
>
> LGTM too. Thank you!

Thank you to you both for looking. Pushed.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-10-09 20:35:44 Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2025-10-09 20:26:08 Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs