| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | a(dot)kozhemyakin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19556: Segmentation fault in test_decoding |
| Date: | 2026-07-28 19:36:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoBvt3qFT3_GXbNekA8eNbYBpxZ5H_+MKPsnaah-MbFNWA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 2:28 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 11:24 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 11:50 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 7:47 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the patch. I like the approach the proposed patch does.
> > > > I've made a patch for PG18+ that fixes both issues with regression
> > > > tests. For PG17 or earlier, the patch doesn't need the changes in
> > > > ReorderBufferPrepare() but has the same regression tests.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The patch LGTM. One minor point: Shall we retain the earlier comments
> > > (We send the prepare for the concurrently aborted xacts so that later
> > > when rollback prepared is decoded and sent, the downstream should be
> > > able to rollback such a xact. See comments atop DecodePrepare.)? This
> > > makes it clear why we are sending prepare for concurrent abort cases.
> >
> > Thank you for reviewing the 0001 patch! Yes, I agree to retain the
> > comment. I'll update the patch and push it early next week.
> >
>
> I prepared the patches for all branches. I'm going to push them
> tomorrow if there is no further comment.
Pushed.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-07-28 09:37:16 | Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) doesn't handle invalid indexes |