| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | a(dot)kozhemyakin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19556: Segmentation fault in test_decoding |
| Date: | 2026-07-23 18:24:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoBZrwQSx7cbv-BApv2hfDR3pmOsFbwpy5wVtWpW1+rVzw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 11:50 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 7:47 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the patch. I like the approach the proposed patch does.
> > I've made a patch for PG18+ that fixes both issues with regression
> > tests. For PG17 or earlier, the patch doesn't need the changes in
> > ReorderBufferPrepare() but has the same regression tests.
> >
>
> The patch LGTM. One minor point: Shall we retain the earlier comments
> (We send the prepare for the concurrently aborted xacts so that later
> when rollback prepared is decoded and sent, the downstream should be
> able to rollback such a xact. See comments atop DecodePrepare.)? This
> makes it clear why we are sending prepare for concurrent abort cases.
Thank you for reviewing the 0001 patch! Yes, I agree to retain the
comment. I'll update the patch and push it early next week.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2026-07-23 19:03:24 | Re: BUG #19575: Enhancement for Redundant DISTINCT in set-operation branches |
| Previous Message | Andrey Borodin | 2026-07-23 17:27:00 | Re: BUG #19576: startup process hangs indefinitely replaying MultiXact/CREATE_ID record |