Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexey Lesovsky <lesovsky(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Date: 2021-08-27 11:03:05
Message-ID: CAD21AoAApJD5w8jxQhOmVB04gd0PQNOH836TFLr_Dyjivi4QxA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 1:36 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 6:24 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 9:11 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Okay, changed accordingly. Additionally, I have changed the code which
> > > sets timestamp to (unset) when it is 0 so that it won't display the
> > > timestamp in that case. I have made few other cosmetic changes in the
> > > attached patch. See and let me know what you think of it?
> >
> > Thank you for the patch!
> >
> > Agreed with these changes. The patch looks good to me.
> >
>
> Pushed, feel free to rebase and send the remaining patch set.

Thanks!

I'll post the updated version patch on Monday.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ajin Cherian 2021-08-27 11:03:17 Re: Failure of subscription tests with topminnow
Previous Message Sadhuprasad Patro 2021-08-27 10:57:46 Re: Next Steps with Hash Indexes