Re: [PATCH] random_normal function

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 6:34 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I double-checked the one-in-a-billion claim, and it looks about right
> > for each test.
>
> Thanks for double-checking my arithmetic.
>
> > The rest looks good to me, except there's a random non-ASCII character
> > instead of a hyphen in "Kolmogorov-Smirnov" (because I copy-pasted the
> > name from some random website).
>
> Yeah, I caught that before committing.
>
> The AIX buildfarm members were still showing low-order diffs in the
> random_normal results at extra_float_digits = 0, but they seem OK
> after reducing it to -1.

I should leave the country more often... thanks for cleaning up my
patch and committing it Tom! It's a Christmas miracle (at least, for
me :)
P.