Re: [PATCH] random_normal function

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random_normal function
Date: 2023-01-10 14:34:39
Message-ID: 262404.1673361279@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I double-checked the one-in-a-billion claim, and it looks about right
> for each test.

Thanks for double-checking my arithmetic.

> The rest looks good to me, except there's a random non-ASCII character
> instead of a hyphen in "Kolmogorov-Smirnov" (because I copy-pasted the
> name from some random website).

Yeah, I caught that before committing.

The AIX buildfarm members were still showing low-order diffs in the
random_normal results at extra_float_digits = 0, but they seem OK
after reducing it to -1.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu) 2023-01-10 14:41:44 RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)
Previous Message Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu) 2023-01-10 14:33:48 RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)