Re: Guidelines for GSoC student proposals / Eliminate O(N^2) scaling from rw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mengxing Liu <liu-mx15(at)mails(dot)tsinghua(dot)edu(dot)cn>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Guidelines for GSoC student proposals / Eliminate O(N^2) scaling from rw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions
Date: 2017-03-27 16:16:11
Message-ID: CACjxUsO2-=7ADSfRJAJuK1qkWo8U_PEepCFq8z7o4cF5prnimw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Mengxing Liu
<liu-mx15(at)mails(dot)tsinghua(dot)edu(dot)cn> wrote:

> I've updated the proposal according to your comments.
> But I am still wondering that can you review it for a double-check
> to make sure I've made everything clear?

Additional comments added.

I'm afraid a few new issues came to mind reading it again. (Nothing
serious; just some points that could benefit from a little
elaboration.)

--
Kevin Grittner

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-03-27 16:18:37 Re: WIP: Faster Expression Processing v4
Previous Message David Rowley 2017-03-27 16:11:14 Re: crashes due to setting max_parallel_workers=0