| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take) |
| Date: | 2017-05-01 17:17:03 |
| Message-ID: | CACjxUsMk=ecHt2mKXGb-bRJHFgzPgAGRz+5GyUhAPdBp568j0Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> It seems pretty clear to me that this is busted.
>>
>> I don't think you actually tested anything that is dependent on any
>> of my patches there.
>
> I was testing which rows show up in a transition table, so I assumed
> that was related to the transition tables patch. Note that this is
> not about which triggers are fired, just about how inheritance
> interacts with transition tables.
Yeah, I got confused a bit there, comparing to the updateable views case.
--
Kevin Grittner
VMware vCenter Server
https://www.vmware.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pierre Ducroquet | 2017-05-01 17:28:59 | Re: Bug with pg_basebackup and 'shared' tablespace |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-01 17:13:11 | Re: PQhost may return socket dir for network connection |