| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take) |
| Date: | 2017-05-01 16:53:43 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY63i_8mpKUbxpi_k2VB9c+bRtOUow8QPcB4yXFYzq4Aw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> It seems pretty clear to me that this is busted.
>
> I don't think you actually tested anything that is dependent on any
> of my patches there.
I was testing which rows show up in a transition table, so I assumed
that was related to the transition tables patch. Note that this is
not about which triggers are fired, just about how inheritance
interacts with transition tables.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-01 17:02:07 | Re: snapbuild woes |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-05-01 16:40:11 | Re: snapbuild woes |