| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage |
| Date: | 2017-01-10 16:13:12 |
| Message-ID: | CACjxUsM5hccrvLzV_=ZPOLwDpAYuRfOV40vpTOSJP4uMeWS=mQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> whether to continue using "see section m.n"-type cross-references
For my part, I have a preference for including the section name
with the link text, although if it took much work to add it (rather
than being the new default) I might question whether the benefit
was worth the effort of adding it.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-01-10 16:26:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-01-10 15:58:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2017-01-10 16:19:04 | Re: Block level parallel vacuum WIP |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-01-10 16:12:51 | Re: RustgreSQL |