| From: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Schema version management |
| Date: | 2012-07-07 15:32:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAC_2qU9DT1f-c=NUjrh0vtSOR-xnU9t7faqaQief08Zijqa3RQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I have code in the wild that defines new operators and casts and has no
> C code and is not in an extension and has no business being in an
> extension.
Nobody is claiming that pgdump shouldn't dump it.
But, since you're using operators, what would you think is an
appropriate name for the file the operator is dumped into?
a.
--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-07-07 17:06:16 | Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-07-07 14:58:40 | Re: Bug tracker tool we need |