Re: Schema version management

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Schema version management
Date: 2012-07-06 20:50:55
Message-ID: 1341607855.7092.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2012-07-05 at 23:52 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> I would argue like Álvaro that when dealing with operators and casts
> you're probably writing an extension already, and we're providing
> another way to deal with that.

I have code in the wild that defines new operators and casts and has no
C code and is not in an extension and has no business being in an
extension.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-07-06 21:03:11 Re: libpq URI and regression testing
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-07-06 20:47:54 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix mapping of PostgreSQL encodings to Python encodings.