| From: | JoongHyuk Shin <sjh910805(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Don't call ereport(ERROR) from recovery target GUC assign hooks |
| Date: | 2026-04-29 09:29:59 |
| Message-ID: | CACSdjfPCPjP9tuzxgarcbkjahu-n+o+LJbUQ22aPNkOsOvrEZg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for the reviews.
v2 attached.
* Conflict check moved to a new static CheckRecoveryTargetConflicts(),
called from validateRecoveryParameters() before its early return.
It runs at every startup, so misconfiguration is caught as in master.
I kept it in startup process rather than PostmasterMain
(Greg'ssuggestion),
matching the existing recovery validation there.
* Removed each assign hook's `else recoveryTarget = UNSET` branch
(B in Fujii's framing). Fixes the empty-string clobber Fujii reported,
`recovery_target_xid='9999' + recovery_target_time=''` was silently
running with no target.
003_recovery_targets.pl now covers it (fails on v1, passes on v2).
* errdetail "may" -> "can" (Greg).
* TAP test that asserted the v1 regression is replaced with one
asserting conflict rejection at every startup.
Agreed: HEAD only, no backpatch.
--
JH Shin
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 3:00 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 02:36:11PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > With the proposed patch, however, both settings are ignored and
> > recovery starts with no target. That seems unexpected to me.
>
> If that's the case (not tested myself), agreed.
> --
> Michael
>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Don-t-call-ereport-ERROR-from-recovery-target-GUC.patch | application/octet-stream | 12.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2026-04-29 09:51:55 | Re: Property graph: fix error handling when dropping non-existent label property |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2026-04-29 09:24:50 | Re: tuple radix sort |