Re: tuple radix sort

On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 3:20 PM cca5507 <cca5507(at)qq(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I also thought we should change this cast:
> >
> > if (ssup->comparator == ssup_datum_signed_cmp)
> > {
> > - norm_datum1 = orig + ((uint64) PG_INT64_MAX) + 1;
> > + norm_datum1 = orig + (Int64GetDatum(PG_INT64_MAX)) + 1;
> > }
> >
> > Upthread you mention something else about treating Datum as an
> > integer, but I'm not sure if this is what you meant since you didn't
> > say. If you have concrete suggestions, feel free to share them.
>
> I think we can keep it as is now.

It's harmless, but see commit ff89e182d.

I included the assert along with the above and some small cosmetic
fixes I've been saving.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services