Re: [doc] minor wording improvement in a couple of places

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [doc] minor wording improvement in a couple of places
Date: 2020-09-07 15:16:28
Message-ID: CACPNZCvwsUq-dtXADYLsHbBxm60LYFN9YMmwREMGekUihadFpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:30 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:34 AM Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> "..., which see for additional details."
>>
>> which strikes me as a bit odd. Suggested phrasing:
>>
>> "...; see this file for additional details."
>>
>
> I agree this sounds very weird. However, this phrasing is also fairly common in comments around the code.

Seems to be a literal translation of Latin "quod vide" (q.v.), so
intentional, just sounds a bit old fashioned. I'd vote to keep it.

--
John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-09-07 15:20:21 Re: Issue with cancel_before_shmem_exit while searching to remove a particular registered exit callbacks
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-09-07 14:42:29 Re: Change a constraint's index - ALTER TABLE ... ALTER CONSTRAINT ... USING INDEX ...