| From: | Fernando <fernandopostgresql(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | mayur <mayur555b(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: need a bit of help |
| Date: | 2026-07-23 19:52:15 |
| Message-ID: | CACMoQV+-MUPqi4yU0+eFDuFvnVx3v5o5-PkoJyruepiE0Lf+zg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Sorry, what I meant is that you check the comments :)
On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 6:00 PM mayur <mayur555b(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, and it seems surprisingly balanced for someone from the Oracle
> community. The post openly acknowledges undo contention and the risk of
> ORA-01555 as trade-offs for not requiring vacuum.
>
> I am going to repost it, as I see it as a pro-Postgres post.
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 5:00 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 9:37 AM Fernando <fernandopostgresql(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>> > Can someone jump on this Linkedin post and give a hand with this Oracle
>> guy?
>>
>> I don't see what the problem is. It looks to me like basically correct
>> about all of that. If anything, I'd say he is giving PostgreSQL the
>> benefit of the doubt.
>>
>> --
>> Robert Haas
>> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>>
>>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2026-07-27 10:21:30 | PGSimCity : Awesome 3D visualiation of PG engine in operation |
| Previous Message | mayur | 2026-07-23 16:00:11 | Re: need a bit of help |