| From: | mayur <mayur555b(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fernando <fernandopostgresql(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: need a bit of help |
| Date: | 2026-07-23 16:00:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAAt+wYc5naA1NQR2bKco6Z=3_uT62MjLDP_VT0RFxpAOVnmT7w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Yes, and it seems surprisingly balanced for someone from the Oracle
community. The post openly acknowledges undo contention and the risk of
ORA-01555 as trade-offs for not requiring vacuum.
I am going to repost it, as I see it as a pro-Postgres post.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 5:00 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 9:37 AM Fernando <fernandopostgresql(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Can someone jump on this Linkedin post and give a hand with this Oracle
> guy?
>
> I don't see what the problem is. It looks to me like basically correct
> about all of that. If anything, I'd say he is giving PostgreSQL the
> benefit of the doubt.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fernando | 2026-07-23 19:52:15 | Re: need a bit of help |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2026-07-23 15:00:12 | Re: need a bit of help |