Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!

From: Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!
Date: 2023-04-07 22:01:30
Message-ID: CACLU5mToKpVgvo6e1Si7_0Yutb6TUEp6WJXq85KEjtTjpVJVJg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 10:21 AM Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:

> As announced on this list feature freeze is at 00:00 April 8 AoE.
> That's less than 24 hours away. If you need to set your watches to AoE
> timezone it's currently:
>
> $ TZ=AOE+12 date
> Fri 07 Apr 2023 02:05:50 AM AOE
>
> As we stand we have:
>
> Status summary:
> Needs review: 82
> Waiting on Author: 16
> Ready for Committer: 27
> Committed: 115
> Moved to next CF: 38
> Returned with Feedback: 10
> Rejected: 9
> Withdrawn: 22
> Total: 319.
>
> In less than 24h most of the remaining patches will get rolled forward
> to the next CF. The 16 that are Waiting on Author might be RwF
> perhaps. The only exceptions would be non-features like Bug Fixes and
> cleanup patches that have been intentionally held until the end --
> those become Open Issues for the release.
>
> So if we move forward all the remaining patches (so these numbers are
> high by about half a dozen) the *next* CF would look like:
>
> Commitfest 2023-07: Now April 8
> Needs review: 46. 128
> Waiting on Author: 17. 33
> Ready for Committer: 3. 30
> Total: 66 191
>
> I suppose that's better than the 319 we came into this CF with but
> there's 3 months to accumulate more unreviewed patches...
>
> I had hoped to find lots of patches that I could bring the hammer down
> on and say there's just no interest in or there's no author still
> maintaining. But that wasn't the case. Nearly all the patches still
> had actively interested authors and looked like they were legitimately
> interesting and worthwhile features that people just haven't had the
> time to review or commit.
>
>
> --
> greg
>
> The %T added to the PSQL Prompt is about 5 lines of code. Reviewed and
Ready to commit.
That could knock one more off really quickly :-)

Excellent work to everyone.

Thanks, Kirk

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-04-07 22:23:26 Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-04-07 21:59:44 Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests