Re: SQL:2011 application time

From: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date: 2023-10-16 04:33:10
Message-ID: CACJufxGnN6-513copYkpgJia6Qq7vKtO6q7cigUpA=4Evozppg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 4:21 AM Paul Jungwirth
<pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 9/24/23 21:52, jian he wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 10:50 AM Paul Jungwirth
> > <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/17/23 20:11, jian he wrote:
> >>> small issues so far I found, v14.
> >>
> >> Thank you again for the review! v15 is attached.
> >>
> >
> > hi. some tiny issues.
>
> Rebased v16 patches attached.

Can you rebase it?
changes in
https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/log/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c
https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/log/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
make it no longer applicable.

I try to manually edit the patch to make it applicable.
but failed at tablecmds.c

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2023-10-16 04:51:24 Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-10-16 04:29:24 Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control