Re: Row pattern recognition

From: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: assam258(at)gmail(dot)com, zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com, sjjang112233(at)gmail(dot)com, vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org, er(at)xs4all(dot)nl, jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org, li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Row pattern recognition
Date: 2026-10-01 09:30:48
Message-ID: CACJufxEGf2=W-Sx8cCcKV2jr8XCYeteBEjdBAW_HUJOwXkT-yQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 3:32 PM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Attached is v53 RPR patches. The v53 is basically just a rebased
> version of v52, due to recent large revert[1], except some very minor
> error messages and comment fixes in gram.y.
> v53 has been created against 999ce9bcd80.
>
> [1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=999ce9bcd80890c3d723e113bb0337c900f9f249
>

Hi.

define_walker is kind of ugly, so i did the attached refactoring,
which make navigation expression check stay within ParseRPRNavCall.
Overall I feel it is more neat than define_walker.
It's based on v53.

--
jian
https://www.enterprisedb.com/

Attachment Content-Type Size
v54-0001-Remove-define_walker-and-validate-navigation-at-Pa.txt text/plain 40.3 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2026-10-01 09:31:50 Re: Fix apply worker crash when subscriber table has only a deferrable primary key
Previous Message Alexander Pyhalov 2026-10-01 09:27:00 Re: Asynchronous MergeAppend