Re: Inconsistent error handling in START_REPLICATION command

From: "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistent error handling in START_REPLICATION command
Date: 2016-01-06 10:38:04
Message-ID: CACACo5RBTjaERB+y6nZgwW5UCBw3NaXwmPA9PZ23w2c3aRbcgQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr <
oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr <
> oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> wrote:
>
>>
>> I didn't look in the code yet, but if someone knows off top of the head
>> the reason to this behavior, I'd be glad to learn it.
>>
>
> Looks like the attached patch fixes it for me:
>

Should I add it to the current commitfest? It seems to me, the patch is
trivial and unambiguous, so that might be an overkill...

Thanks.
--
Alex

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-01-06 10:39:12 Re: Proposal: SET ROLE hook
Previous Message Rushabh Lathia 2016-01-06 09:58:29 Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW