| From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? |
| Date: | 2020-04-02 16:12:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAC4D04E-352F-4969-B71C-5CE0E2696899@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Apr 2, 2020, at 9:06 AM, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> ("xid8_current" is not exercised by name anywhere in the regression suite, that I can see.)
I spoke too soon. That's exercised in the new xid.sql test file. It didn't show up in my 'git diff', because it's new. Sorry about that.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-02 16:16:03 | Re: Ltree syntax improvement |
| Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2020-04-02 16:06:10 | Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? |