Re: Ltree syntax improvement

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>
Subject: Re: Ltree syntax improvement
Date: 2020-04-02 16:16:03
Message-ID: 19151.1585844163@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> Rebased patch attached.

Thanks for rebasing! The cfbot's not very happy though:

4842ltxtquery_io.c: In function ‘makepol’:
4843ltxtquery_io.c:188:13: error: ‘escaped’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
4844 if (lenval - escaped <= 0)
4845 ^
4846ltxtquery_io.c:230:6: note: ‘escaped’ was declared here
4847 int escaped;
4848 ^
4849cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2020-04-02 16:36:32 Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more.
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2020-04-02 16:12:28 Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?