Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks?

From: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks?
Date: 2023-08-10 15:06:01
Message-ID: CAC+AXB0Q_fps6AAUUuTnpMq-YBOaHx9zod0AgMRB4833E7DA4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:

>
> As there is no new patch submitted I will go ahead and do that, please feel
> free to resubmit when there is renewed interest in working on this.
>
>
Recently I restored a database from a directory format backup and having
this feature would have been quite useful. So, I would like to resume the
work on this patch, unless OP or someone else is already on it.

Regards,

Juan José Santamaría Flecha

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2023-08-10 16:55:15 Re: Add PG CI to older PG releases
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-08-10 15:05:37 Re: Add PG CI to older PG releases