| From: | Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks? |
| Date: | 2023-08-17 07:32:06 |
| Message-ID: | 3c6d20a3-a224-cb56-2893-d4aed5d8b5df@dalibo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/10/23 17:06, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> Recently I restored a database from a directory format backup and having
> this feature would have been quite useful
Hi,
Thanks for resuming work on this patch. I forgot to mention this in my
original email, but the motivation was also to speed up the restore
process. Parallelizing the FK checks could make a huge difference in
certain cases. We should probably provide such a test case (with perf
numbers), and maybe this is it what Robert asked for.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiro Ikeda | 2023-08-17 07:37:22 | Re: WIP: new system catalog pg_wait_event |
| Previous Message | shveta malik | 2023-08-17 06:25:44 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |