| From: | Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inconsistent results with libc sorting on Windows |
| Date: | 2023-07-03 16:37:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAC+AXB0GCAHhT1FfaVzSnw0DjOJcbSPrO9BX4CKPMF1BqHFjoA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
El lun, 3 jul 2023, 17:42, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
escribió:
> On 2023-Jun-19, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
>
> > Ok, let's see where the report goes:
> >
> >
> https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/CompareStringEx-non-transitive/10393003?q=comparestringex
>
> Hm, so this appears to have been marked as solved by Microsoft. Can you
> recheck? Also, what does the resolution mean for Postgres, in practical
> terms?
>
It's not really solved, they have just pushed the issue to another team
that's only reachable through the Windows feedback hub. I've already
provided the feedback, but it's only visible through the proprietary app.
I would say there haven't been any real progress on that front so far.
Regards,
Juan José Santamaría Flecha
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-07-03 16:42:28 | Re: [PATCH] Add <<none>> support to sepgsql_restorecon |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-07-03 16:34:47 | Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f |