Re: Inconsistent results with libc sorting on Windows

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inconsistent results with libc sorting on Windows
Date: 2023-07-03 15:42:49
Message-ID: 20230703154249.bgvsrzu3kerhtwvy@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-Jun-19, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:

> Ok, let's see where the report goes:
>
> https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/CompareStringEx-non-transitive/10393003?q=comparestringex

Hm, so this appears to have been marked as solved by Microsoft. Can you
recheck? Also, what does the resolution mean for Postgres, in practical
terms?

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"If you have nothing to say, maybe you need just the right tool to help you
not say it." (New York Times, about Microsoft PowerPoint)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2023-07-03 15:46:26 Re: Extension Enhancement: Buffer Invalidation in pg_buffercache
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-07-03 15:19:51 Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits