| From: | Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Support EXCEPT for TABLES IN SCHEMA publications |
| Date: | 2026-07-20 07:21:28 |
| Message-ID: | CABdArM75UjHV2FPXSUTNAVaUxyR_jbuCoa0qnfEnJws3Px-SFQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 9:50 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Nisha.
>
> I noticed multiple places where these patches want to discover the
> root partition table OID, but they are not interested in the ancestor
> tree.
>
> I've created another thread/patch [1] to introduce a
> `get_partition_root` C function. I think this could simplify some of
> your code by removing the requirement to declare and free the unwanted
> ancestor lists.
>
> Please take a look and give your +1 there if you think it would be useful.
>
Okay, the idea looks reasonable to me. I'll review the patch and share
my thoughts on the thread.
--
Thanks,
Nisha
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-07-20 07:35:04 | Unlogged materialized views |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-07-20 07:16:02 | Re: Restore vacuum_delay_point() in GIN posting-tree leaf vacuum |