| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Support EXCEPT for TABLES IN SCHEMA publications |
| Date: | 2026-07-17 04:19:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PtzpgpeWkay9v_zfsLLeO7GirZnGqTUWm_hix+yFNiDvw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Nisha.
I noticed multiple places where these patches want to discover the
root partition table OID, but they are not interested in the ancestor
tree.
I've created another thread/patch [1] to introduce a
`get_partition_root` C function. I think this could simplify some of
your code by removing the requirement to declare and free the unwanted
ancestor lists.
Please take a look and give your +1 there if you think it would be useful.
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2026-07-17 05:17:08 | Re: sequencesync worker race with REFRESH SEQUENCES |
| Previous Message | Denis Smirnov | 2026-07-17 04:17:26 | Re: Batching in executor |