| From: | Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance |
| Date: | 2019-03-13 14:33:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAB_COdi1hrXS_ZZ6JGGGWCsAcMWR1HtgkvtxxUgSSCfqACsYzQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks, Tom !
Thank you everyone for your help and patience.
Cheers,
Lætitia
Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 20:57, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> a écrit :
> =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A6titia_Avrot?= <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > So, as you're asking that too, maybe my reasons weren't good enough.
> You'll
> > find enclosed a new version of the patch
> > with asinh, acosh and atanh (v5).
>
> Pushed with some minor adjustments (mainly cleanup of the error handling).
>
> > Then I tried for several days to implement the 6 last hyperbolic
> functions,
> > but I wasn't satisfied with the result, so I just dropped it.
>
> Yeah, I agree that sech() and so on are not worth the trouble. If they
> were commonly used, they'd be in POSIX ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Evgeniy Efimkin | 2019-03-13 14:55:56 | Re: Special role for subscriptions |
| Previous Message | Maxence Ahlouche | 2019-03-13 14:14:43 | Show a human-readable n_distinct in pg_stats view |