Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance
Date: 2019-03-12 19:57:30
Message-ID: 10840.1552420650@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A6titia_Avrot?= <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> So, as you're asking that too, maybe my reasons weren't good enough. You'll
> find enclosed a new version of the patch
> with asinh, acosh and atanh (v5).

Pushed with some minor adjustments (mainly cleanup of the error handling).

> Then I tried for several days to implement the 6 last hyperbolic functions,
> but I wasn't satisfied with the result, so I just dropped it.

Yeah, I agree that sech() and so on are not worth the trouble. If they
were commonly used, they'd be in POSIX ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-03-12 20:08:53 Re: current_logfiles not following group access and instead follows log_file_mode permissions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-03-12 19:55:14 pgsql: Add support for hyperbolic functions, as well as log10().