Re: Planet posting policy

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
Date: 2012-01-30 18:00:26
Message-ID: CABUevEzG2Qb5kuw5=YnAx9-aAhh0r5YJ9kdZNzA5CwQKbmvsmw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 18:58, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I think that blog post itself is a very good example of content we
>> *don't* necessarily want on planet.
>
> See, while for me it's exactly the kind of post I think *should* be
> included.  Because I'm a working consultant, I'm interested in what the
> various commercial forks can do for my customers, and as a PostgreSQL
> hacker I'm interested in what the various commercial tools tell us about
> our users.  As long as it's not press releases.

Did you read the example? It *was* basically a press release...

> I don't think it's going to be possible to have one feed which pleases
> everyone.  Maybe we should have two feeds?  /oss and /universe ?

Sure, we could probably find a way to do that, but is the demand
really high enough to make it worth it?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2012-01-30 18:05:17 Re: Planet posting policy
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2012-01-30 17:58:53 Re: Planet posting policy