From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Planet posting policy |
Date: | 2012-01-30 18:00:26 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEzG2Qb5kuw5=YnAx9-aAhh0r5YJ9kdZNzA5CwQKbmvsmw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 18:58, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I think that blog post itself is a very good example of content we
>> *don't* necessarily want on planet.
>
> See, while for me it's exactly the kind of post I think *should* be
> included. Because I'm a working consultant, I'm interested in what the
> various commercial forks can do for my customers, and as a PostgreSQL
> hacker I'm interested in what the various commercial tools tell us about
> our users. As long as it's not press releases.
Did you read the example? It *was* basically a press release...
> I don't think it's going to be possible to have one feed which pleases
> everyone. Maybe we should have two feeds? /oss and /universe ?
Sure, we could probably find a way to do that, but is the demand
really high enough to make it worth it?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-01-30 18:05:17 | Re: Planet posting policy |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-01-30 17:58:53 | Re: Planet posting policy |