| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PROXY protocol support |
| Date: | 2021-03-05 09:14:49 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEz9TLONY3VtOMkUUKpf+Mb4XD79mXrtwUb-c9VwQ4ek-w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:08 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> >> On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 10:42 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >> > Is there any formal specification for the "a protocol common and very
> >> > light weight in proxies"?
> >>
> >> See
> >>
> >> https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.8/doc/proxy-protocol.txt
> >
> > Yeah, it's currently in one of the comments, but should probably be
> > added to the docs side as well.
>
> It seems the protocol is HAproxy product specific and I think it would
> be better to be mentioned in the docs.
It's definitely not HAProxy specific, it's more or less an industry
standard. It's just maintained by them. That said, yes, it should be
referenced in the docs.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2021-03-05 09:22:35 | Re: PROXY protocol support |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-03-05 09:08:19 | Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails |