| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | magnus(at)hagander(dot)net |
| Cc: | pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PROXY protocol support |
| Date: | 2021-03-04 23:08:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20210305.080837.1960220674978117339.t-ishii@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 10:42 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> > Is there any formal specification for the "a protocol common and very
>> > light weight in proxies"?
>>
>> See
>>
>> https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.8/doc/proxy-protocol.txt
>
> Yeah, it's currently in one of the comments, but should probably be
> added to the docs side as well.
It seems the protocol is HAproxy product specific and I think it would
be better to be mentioned in the docs.
> And yes tests :) Probably not a regression test, but some level of tap
> testing should definitely be added. We'll just have to find a way to
> do that without making haproxy a dependency to run the tests :)
Agreed.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-03-04 23:12:36 | Re: Replace buffer I/O locks with condition variables (reviving an old patch) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-04 23:06:08 | Re: SPI return |