From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bugs and bug tracking |
Date: | 2015-10-07 19:01:26 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEyqe-4Lsj=F_5RVyoqxP-rr7qb4fYWtSv7ajr5zEA0OwA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > I *really* don't like the idea of rewriting the From/To completely to
> > force all mail through a relay and I'm pretty sure that "fix" would be
> > far worse than the problem.
>
> Agreed; but adding a Reply-To: header seems quite reasonable. (Unless
> gmail ignores that, which I wouldn't put past it ...)
>
It does not.
I'm sure there's *some* MUA out there that does, but probably not the big
ones.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-10-07 19:06:50 | Re: bugs and bug tracking |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-10-07 18:59:08 | Re: bugs and bug tracking |